Revision f5f11d71 doc/ffmpeg-doc.texi

View differences:

doc/ffmpeg-doc.texi
1594 1594
'replaces lrint by lrintf'), and why (for example '*BSD isn't C99 compliant
1595 1595
and has no lrint()')
1596 1596

  
1597
We reply to all submitted patches and either apply or reject with some
1598
explanation why, but sometimes we are quite busy so it can take a week or two.
1597
@section Patch review process
1598

  
1599
All patches posted to ffmpeg-devel will be reviewed, unless they contain a
1600
clear note that the patch is not for SVN.
1601
Reviews and comments will be posted as replies to the patch on the
1602
mailinglist. The patch submitter then has to take care of every comment,
1603
that can be by resubmitting a changed patch or by disscussion. Resubmitted
1604
patches will themselfs be reviewed like any other patch. If at some point
1605
a patch passes review with no comments then it is approved, that can for
1606
simple and small patches happen immedeatly while large patches will generally
1607
have to be changed and reviewed many times before they are approved.
1608
After a patch is approved it will be applied to ffmpeg svn
1609

  
1610
We will review all submitted patches, but sometimes we are quite busy so
1611
especially for large patches this can take several weeks.
1612

  
1613
When resubmitting patches, please do not make any significant changes
1614
unrelated to the comments such patches will be rejected, Instead submit
1615
such significant changes or new features as seperate patches.
1599 1616

  
1600 1617
@section Regression tests
1601 1618

  

Also available in: Unified diff